Showing posts with label WA Shark Cull. Show all posts
Showing posts with label WA Shark Cull. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 14, 2015

Killing tagged GWS - bravo Andrew!

Andrew with his father, the legendary Rodney. Source.

Remember this post?

Sure you do! :)
Therein, I refer to this courageous blog post by Corey Bradshaw where he exposes how the Australian government is censoring and muzzling its scientists. That policy continues to this day, and the sometimes baffling reticence by some members of the Australian scientific community to address the WA Shark cull needs to be weighed against this backdrop - and this is also precisely why the unflinching public opposition by people like Colin and Jessica fills me with particular admiration!

Enter Andrew Fox of GSD.
He too is far from being impervious to the wrath of government that holds sway over the renewal of his licenses - and still, he too has decided to go public against the demented shenanigans in Western Australia. You can find Andrew's comments, along with further details about that totally misguided policy here.

Bravo Andrew, I'm proud of 'ya mate!

Saturday, December 20, 2014

Western Australia - Imminent Threat Policy!


Oh for fuck's sake.

Read this.
Seriously, how can a Shark be a threat if you know where it is!
But instead of doing the sensible thing = telling the people to stay away from that beach til the GWS moves on, they are using the pings from the tags to go and kill it.  This idiotic policy is saving no-one but instead, it will only have one possible outcome: they will eventually end up back at square one, i.e. with no more tagged Sharks and no more information about where they are.

Seriously - what a bunch of morons!

Friday, September 12, 2014

Western Australia - now we wait!


Yes yesterday was cause for celebration.

But!
To those who have started with the chest thumping I say, not so fast!
Yesterday's decision by the EPA is great, and it is also great that the WA Government has stated that they will abide by it.
However on the EPA website, I read this.
The EPA’s report to the Minister for Environment is now open for a two-week public appeal period. Appeals close September 25, 2014 and can be made at www.appealsconvenor.wa.gov.au 

Appeals are administered independently of the EPA by the Appeals Convenor and determined by the Minister for Environment. This proposal is also being assessed under a bilateral agreement with the Commonwealth. This means both State and Federal Ministers for the Environment will make a decision under their respective legislations. Both Ministers will need to give approval for the proposal to proceed.
The Fat Lady hasn't sung quite yet, so let's wait and see how things play out.
The State may still retract its current position and still make a last-ditch attempt at turning things around - in which case the ball would be in the court of the Federal Environment Minister. Hunt has been quite adamant about wanting to do things by the book - but this is the Abbott government that has completely lost the plot (and here!) when it comes to conservation, so there's definitely an element of risk there.
But having said that, I'm actually quite optimistic.

And then, there is this.
You really got to read the exhaustive EPA decision.
You will find that it is based principally on the peer review by CSIRO (three documents here) and that in essence, the EPA is simply applying the precautionary principle in view of the uncertainty about the effects of the cull on the South-Western population of GWS. Only - not the Bulls, not the Tigers where EPA considers that the proposal presents a low risk to the viability of populations for other target sharks and non-target marine fauna.
You may also want to note that the other arguments against the cull have been noted, addressed and essentially dismissed - and that the only aspect the EPA has assessed is the environmental impact, not public safety or ethics or the like.
Just sayin'.

Now, we wait.

Thursday, September 11, 2014

No more Cull in Western Australia!

Source.

BOOOM!!!

Read THIS!
Yes the EPA is against the cull and the Premier has stated that he will accept their decision!

See? Sometimes the process works!
A big THANK YOU, and congratulations to those of you who have taken part in the Public Environmental Review and have operated with arguments instead of listening to the crazies!

And particularly, bravo Ryan Kempster and SOS!
Excellent job!
 

Tuesday, September 02, 2014

Scientists about Shark Mitigation Measures!


Watch.



97% of those polled scientists are against lethal control measures.
Incidentally, those would be the very people that were picketed, heckled and insulted by Lesley Rochat and her Shark Warriors.

Vindicated my ass!
That whole project, or whatever, is increasingly becoming bizarre and frankly, rather sad.
What a shame.
 

Sunday, July 27, 2014

WA Shark Cull - Submission!!



This is really as good as it gets.
Yes it was commissioned by Sea Shepherd for whom I harbor, to state it mildly, mixed feelings - so kudos to them for having aligned with (?) this simply brilliant environmental lawyer!

Required reading!

Friday, July 25, 2014

Sea Shepherd - milking the Shark Cull!

Oh yes, this would be another Shark Operation - remember?

Have you seen this?

It's the usual tried-and-tested MO.
Having squandered heaps of donor money, made a lot of noise and achieved A Big Fat Zero like always, Sea Shepherd now want more of your money. For something that has already been done better and pro bono by others who have then posted it online so that everybody could watch it for free.

And money they will get.
Didn't we just mention PT Barnum yesterday?

Oh well.


Thursday, July 17, 2014

A Revolution in Shark Control?

Shark cull in Reunion - source.

Hmmm...
Have you seen this?

I must say that I'm irritated - intellectually that is.
So, the cull in Hawaii did not reduce the incidence of shark bites. Indeed, because those are highly migratory Tiger Sharks, and new Sharks moved in and took the place of those individuals that were removed by culling - correct?

The target species of the WA Shark cull are those highly migratory GWS.
So if lethal removing of migratory Sharks has been shown not to work in Hawaii - what leads us to boldly state that non-lethal removing of migratory Sharks in Western Australia will?
Can't have it both ways!

And why did the relocating work in Recife?
Because those were Bull Sharks = a not highly migratory species! The Sharks were dragged offshore and released, after which they likely settled somewhere else on the coast and/or may have learned to avoid the region were they had been subjected to such a traumatic experience.

Which begs the question, would this strategy work in Reunion?
Alas, methinks not - because the island is so small that it likely does not feature any "unproblematic" coastlines for the Sharks to relocate to, and because it is too isolated for the Sharks to swim somewhere else! By the same token, in Reunion, culling is likely to reduce the incidence of Shark strikes as it will gradually whittle down a discrete resident population of Sharks.
Not nice - but people are working on alternative solutions!

The good news?
The data from Western Australia's Shark Bay are much more ambiguous, meaning that a good portion of those WA Tiger Sharks are likely not highly migratory - remember this post? Tiger Shark migration appears to be mediated by the geographical location insofar as closer to the equator, temperatures vary less, prey migrates less and thus evolution has not selected for Tiger Sharks to go walkabout.
And if so, relocating those WA Tiger Sharks may well work!

Detail detail!
Or am I missing something here?

Friday, July 11, 2014

WA Shark Cull - Nat Geo Wild!


The cull is now on Wikipedia.
Not perfect but not bad, either.

Same-same for this reportage.
It sure frames the issue correctly i.e. the cull is ethically and scientifically untenable - but people are scared and demand action = quick-fix solutions.
Anyway, well worth watching.



Wednesday, July 09, 2014

WA Shark Cull - great Turnout!

Good point!

Read this.

That's quite impressive, bravo!
Now we'll see whether the postulated silent majority exists, or not - and if they've chosen to remain silent, then they've missed their chance and whatever they think, or not, is henceforth totally irrelevant!

And this shit?
Merely the rant by some anti-liberal lunatic?
I would think, yes, the author comes across as a total moron - but as David correctly remarks, most of the ammunition for the stupid rant stems from the fact that the anti-cull movement has failed to distance itself from its most radical, stupidest and outright craziest elements that have managed to largely hijack the public discourse with their strident extremist vociferating.

Anyway.
Hopefully, it matters not.
Hopefully, the anti-cull submissions have argued with facts and not the usual pathetic platitudes, insults and threats. Talking of which, I must say that I was quite impressed and actually, pleasantly surprised by this submission by the TGSCI - unfortunately terribly late but other than that, a really valiant effort both in content and in style!
Bravo!

Now we wait.
The WA government has so far shown remarkable transparency and it will be interesting to see the breakdown of positions once the results are published - and of course, to find out about the next move by the EPA!

Fingers crossed!

Sunday, July 06, 2014

WA Shark Cull - last Day for Submissions!


Bravo!
Over 300 scientists have posted their submission against the cull.

And you?
Remember this is a PER - and to illustrate the sheer reach of the ecological impact, look no further than this epic voyage by a tagged Tiger Shark and remember the equally epic voyage by Nicole
Valuable arguments here, here and here - and once again, huge kudos to Jessica Meeuwig for coordinating that effort!

Please post your submission.
Thank you!

Friday, July 04, 2014

Opposing Western Australia’s Shark Cull!


Excellent stuff!

Please read this, and the links within.
Together with this list, it provides a plethora of excellent science- and fact-based arguments against the cull.

And if you have not already, please post your submission.
Time is running out!

Wednesday, July 02, 2014

Riley in Western Australia!


Watch this.



Exactly.
That's why I like the dude, he boils it down to the essentials, and this without the unhelpful hyperbole: on top of doing nothing for the safety of the ocean users, the senseless slaughter of those Sharks and the negative publicity it creates are a PR catastrophe for WA's tourism industry.

Less than a week to go.
I was happy to notice that several prominent Shark conservation advocates have posted reminders about the PER, with links to the excellent recommendations by Support our Sharks. Rather unsurprisingly, the loudest agitators have not, which once again confirms my suspicion that it was always all about them, the FB likes and the noise rather than the well being of those Sharks.

Anyway.

Friday, June 20, 2014

Western Australia - Case in Point!

The 14 week trial attracted intense media and community interest. 
The trial generated: 
  • 765 separate articles on sharks in local, state and national newspapers 
  • 1,100 radio news bulletins on sharks (Western Australia) 
  • 850 radio talk back comments on sharks (Western Australia) 
  • 290 television news items on sharks (Western Australia) 
  • 286,000 emails and letters to the Department of the Premier and Cabinet (DPC) - a significant number of which were pro forma emails
  • and a significant number of postings on Twitter and Facebook, some of which were offensive and contained personal attacks on members of the Government and staff involved with the program.
Talk about full transparency!
And the net result of that onslaught of unsolicited appeals, petitions (= pro forma emails), opinions and abuse?

A big fat zero.
Not only are they completely disregarding them, they are proposing to extend the cull for another three years and have gone on the offensive by claiming that a silent majority is in favor but had “no choice but to stay quiet due to the level of abuse and vilification received”, describing the level of personal attack and social media postings as “unacceptable”.
So, can we please stop this insanity?

Now, we shall see.
Both the postulated silent majority and the anti-cull faction have an equal opportunity to have their voices heard - and I sure hope that the latter is not only composed of social media slacktivists and agitators but that instead, it will make a vigorous attempt at turning things around by fielding rational arguments.
Not really convinced that the WA government will listen - but along with the federal assessment, it's the best opportunity we got.
Recommendations here.

Please make your submission - the clock is ticking!
Fingers crossed!

Monday, June 16, 2014

Western Australia - Public Environmental Review!


So here it is.

This is the formal process I was talking about.
Here you can find the full Environmental review, and here are some excellent arguments courtesy of the ever formidable Jessica Meeuwig, a brilliant researcher and  Shark diver who is very much taking a personal risk by publicly opposing the cull. Please read them - then you will have plenty of ammunition for posting your submission against the cull.

And the petitions?
They didn't work last time and there are no indications that the EPA will consider them now. The  official process is this one and if you really want to make a difference, this is the correct way to have your voice heard. Remember this is an Environmental Review so arguments must be pertinent to that topic, so statements like For The Sharks For The Oceans For The Future!! >~xo:] x and the like simply out you as a whack and do nothing to protect those Sharks.
Those videos and social media rants were (hopefully) meant to create awareness - now is the time to harness that awareness and convince people to make submissions, as ultimately, that is the only metric that counts!

And please, do not insult, and do not follow the advice of the crazies!
You are asking the WA government to change their mind and call off the cull and it is them, not you, that ultimately have the power to say yay or nay - so pissing them off is certainly not conducive to bringing about a positive result!

Thank you!

Thursday, June 12, 2014

Mermaid and Tiger Sharks?


This is gonna be a difficult one.
But first, watch this.


Now, read this and then, watch the video.


Yes it certainly is what it is.
To say it mildly, it has generated a lot of interest within the Shark community, and opinions are vehemently divided about whether this is actually conservation or rather, merely one more of those productions - and I'm sure you know what I mean.

Personally, I must confess that I'm conflicted.
I've never met Hannah who for me is a professional doing a difficult job, and this well - but I know both Shawn and Jimmy and in my book, they are good men that care deeply. 

But what is more important, is that they have earned my respect.
Jimmy is without a doubt one of the world's most experienced and renown Shark diving operators and a passionate voice for Shark conservation. 
Shawn has evolved into one of the universally most respected conservationists who combines limitless passion and energy with profound knowledge of the situation especially in the lesser developed countries, with admirable tenacity and the absolute willingness to risk life and limb in his relentless investigation and documentation of the trade, and in the pursuit of realistic solutions. Case in point: his and DaMary's ongoing epic Manta Ray of Hope project (watch this space for an important update!) that has directly led to the listing of the Mantas on CITES 2 and continues to spawn Manta Ray sanctuaries, latest of which in the Maldives.
From that point of view alone, this is certainly miles away from those pathetic self promoting productions featuring the usual menopausally challenged bikinettes, precocious home-schooled brats and media whores - and yes I can certainly leave it at that, they know who they are and so do you!

But is this conservation - and is it effective?
To some it may be art, whereas most Europeans including me would define it as typical American over-the-top new-agesque Kitsch - but be it as it may, the fact is that there is a lot of people who simply love those mermaids, meaning that like Shawn eloquently explains, the outreach is simply phenomenal. 

When it comes to having a real impact, however, not convinced.
This is specifically being framed as a protest against the Aussie Shark cull - and I just cannot see how it is going to influence the decision about whether to extend the slaughter to 2017. The assessment by the WA EPA will be a formal process, and so will be the review by the feds - meaning that if at all (!), the decision makers will be swayed by rational as opposed to emotional arguments.
But who knows, maybe some of them have watched it and something sticks.

Long story short?
On this one, I'm with Jimmy an Shawn.
It has been created by the right people and for the right reasons, the production is impressive, the interactions are respectful, the safety protocols impeccable, the imagery and soundtrack and editing excellent, the outreach unmatched.

So bravo and best of luck.
May I be mistaken and may this effect change.

Not convinced - but fingers crossed!

Thursday, May 08, 2014

WA Shark Cull - this Time it's gonna be done by the Book!

Source.

Watch this.



No oxygen in their lungs huh.
Whatever - as long as it's for the Sharks - right?

Anyway.
This time there will be a full Public Environmental Review by the State's EPA, and this article explains that the Federal Government is insisting on equally conducting their own full assessment under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act.

This is good news indeed.
Fingers crossed!

Wednesday, April 23, 2014

WA Shark Cull - Public Assessment!


There are new developments.

For once, this is good news - media statement here.
As hoped for, there will be a Public Environmental Review of the Shark cull, with a four-week public submission period.

But please, be careful with those submissions!
There will be a formal process (good fact sheet here!) and those dudes are not those maligned politicians but people that generally know what they are talking about and that are able to distinguish good arguments from sharkitarian BS. So once again, please spare yourselves the insults, the platitudes and the pathos and make sure that what you submit is grounded in fact, for which you will need to inform yourselves.

Please follow the advice of the leaders.
My preferred source of information continues to be SOS where Ryan Kempster has been leading the fight from day one. He is in WA, is a Shark biologist and as such, he disposes of the required knowledge and also, of invaluable contacts within the scientific community. Here is an excellent resource and please do peruse the open letter by those 100+ Shark experts as a starting point for your argumentation.
Conversely, DO NOT follow the advice, or whatever, of the crazies like Brush and the likes, and DO NOT utter the dreaded O-word!

NGOs: Leadership and guidance please!

Monday, April 14, 2014

WA Shark Cull - Recommendations by Riley!

Source - and do watch the video!

Read this.

Totally agree.
Please submit your comment right away as the submission period ends this Wednesday, April 16.
Like Riley, I advocate choosing as it is less rigid than API category B and also more open to scrutiny by the public.

Thank you.