Indeed!
Hah!
I totally missed this when it came out.
Please do take the time to watch it.
There you will also find links to excellent answers by Shark Savers to those allegations. In essence, KT's arguments once again detract from the fact that the majority of the fins originate from completely unregulated, unsustainable and often illegal fisheries.
So no need for me to dwell on a rebuttal.
But of course there's also a big kernel of truth!
It is certainly completely wrong to engage in unilateral Asia bashing.
And from a conservation point of view, it makes absolutely no sense whatsoever to ban the fins of (already dead) Sharks that have been fished sustainably, let alone been certified - the more since if you watch the interview with the Singaporean fin trader at the end, there already appears to be a trade in sustainably sourced fins.
So, it's back to square one isn't it.
The various campaigns to curb the demand for Shark fin soup are laudable, and the successes are impressive - nice synopsis with excellent comments by Sam
here. But like she correctly remarks, Sharks continue to be targeted for other reasons, and bycatch rates plus IUU remain a grave concern.
But to facilitate the monitoring and the enforcement, this is what we should ask for
- That anybody trading in Sharks and Shark parts come up with independent proof that his merchandise originates from sustainable and legal fisheries and has been obtained by legal means
As long as that proof is not forthcoming, the pressure on the industry should be kept up.
But once the industry shows a willingness to reform,
- Let us help establish and grow a premium market for certified Shark fins from sustainably managed Shark fisheries!
I know - not what the breathy sharktivists want to hear.
But it is the right thing to do. Like
I said, you may oppose it and and then find yourselves trying to catch up later - or you can embrace it and be at the forefront of smart pragmatic conservation.
The choice is yours.