Showing posts with label Juliet Eilperin. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Juliet Eilperin. Show all posts

Thursday, October 27, 2011

Juliet - excellent, once again!

Killed for nothing - Shark cull in Sharm - pic via BushWarriors

Thank you Juliet!
If Shark conservation has indeed gone mainstream, it is in large part owing to the relentless efforts of Mrs Eilperin who continues to crank out excellent pro-Shark media (this is just a small sample) in the most prestigious and widely read publications.

Case in point, this article in the Washington Post.
Starting from re-branding Shark attacks as Shark strikes, this is smart, well documented and compelling reading that once again helps put things into the right perspective. The pictures are by Christine Shepard, like Madi Pip a young passionate and extremely promising Shark media lady with a bright future ahead of her.

As always, required reading!

Wednesday, August 17, 2011

Q&A with Juliet Eilperin!

Would that be one of Doc's Lemon babies?

Did you know that every last bit of the Kesennuma Sharks gets utilized?
Neither did I when I wrote that post - but thanks to Juliet Eilperin's fascinating and meticulously researched Demon Fish - Travels Through the Hidden World of Sharks, I have had to change quite a few of my misconceptions! It is required reading for anybody wanting to talk about Sharks with any degree of authority in 2011, as does she - and no, I'm not going to review it: Callum Roberts has done an excellent job here, and here is a strong endorsement by David of SFS.
Long story short: brilliant!

Need I repeat that I am a fan?
Ever since discovering the promo video for her book, she has continued to impress me with a string of excellent articles about Sharks, and this in the big mainstream media where millions of people get to read them. Talk about stellar outreach by the best possible person!
Needless to say that when David approached me with the idea of intermediating an interview, I jumped at the chance!

The result is below.
I must say, I was trying to entice her to be a bit more toothy than in her usual objective reporting but she is just simply too smart and has deftly dodged all the possible pitfalls whilst remaining her usual elegant, erudite and eloquent - likely as a result of having spent way to many years reporting about politicians before becoming an environmental reporter! :)

So, without any further ado - enjoy!

Q1
Bula Juliet, welcome to the Fiji Shark Blog. I’ve read and enjoyed your book Demon Fish and very much welcome this opportunity. From what I understand, you have largely abandoned a rather formidable career as political reporter in favor of reporting about ecological issues. Why this apparent change in focus and why have you chosen to focus on Sharks in particular.

After covering a polarized political system for my entire political career, I was interested in a change. One of the things I enjoy most about covering the environment is it touches so many aspects of the human experience—our economy, our health and our way of seeing the world, to name a few. I was drawn to the ocean because there’s so much interesting scientific discoveries being made there, and looking at sharks is a great way to explore the sea’s global expanse.

Q2
What are Sharks to you, personally and emotionally.

To me, they’re members of a foreign nation, which we can observe and seek to understand. They also connect us to our past, and link together disparate regions and cultures of the world. Just as important, they’re beautiful creatures who deserve respect in their own right. I have affection for them as well, but I’m not under any illusion that they feel the same way about me.

Q3
In conducting your research for Demon Fish, you have traveled the world and talked to many parties: the fishermen, the fin traders, the consumers, the researchers, the Shark conservationists, the Shark diving operators. All of them have interests at stake and all of them are convinced of their position, meaning that there is ample scope for conflict as many opinions appear irreconcilable. With that in mind and also keeping in mind the larger issues of population growth, growth of individual ecological footprints but also Global Warming and Ocean Acidification: how hopeful are you that the most endangered species of Sharks will survive into the next century, and why.

I’m an optimist by nature, and I also believe in the importance of sharing information—otherwise I wouldn’t be in the news business. So I’d say sharks have a good chance of surviving into the next century, because we’re finally having an honest discussion about how they’re doing and what it would take to save them.

Q4
Shark conservation strategies have many facets, spanning the gamut from rather strident social media activism to quiet policy advocacy, and from establishing local sanctuaries and local and regional pro-Shark legislation to trying to re-educate the consumers. Many conservationists are at odds about which strategies are best. This blog advocates that since global resources for conservation (money but also people, brain power, passion, time etc) are finite, they must be prioritized in favor of what is more effective and efficient. With that in mind, do you see strategies that in your view appear more promising than others in reducing or even halting the demise of Shark populations.

There’s no question that it would take a combination of policy changes and market forces to eliminate overfishing of sharks. So rather than see it as an either-or, I’d say that it’s clear the world’s policymakers are becoming more open to creating marine reserves and enacting some shark fishing restrictions, but unless the demand for shark products declines in Asia, you’re going to see the hunting of sharks in large numbers continue.

Q5
Can fishing for Sharks be sustainable.

According to most scientists I’ve interviewed, only a small handful of shark species can sustain any sort of human fishing pressure. That’s a tough assessment for some folks to accept, but the fact that so many shark species take so long to mature sexually and produce relatively-few offspring at a time makes them too vulnerable to be caught commercially or recreationally.

Q6
You state here that you do not wish to dive with Bull Sharks, our flagship species and one of the most timid and endearing Sharks I have personally encountered. Would you consider giving it a try if we invited you and seconded several intrepid dive guides to act as your personal bodyguards.

Yes! I’m confident that if you and some other experienced guides came in the water with me, the bull sharks would treat me with the same sort of respect I try to show them. I’m sure it would be a stunning sight.

Vinaka vakalevu!

Thursday, August 11, 2011

Another good one by Juliet!

Blunt, by Richard Ng. The silhouette in the background is Sickle.

Read this.
Yes, it's once again by Juliet Eilperin who has obviously carved herself a nice sharky niche and is being kept busy cranking out excellent pro-Shark media. Great to see it happening in the mainstream media with millions of readers, for which I'm even inclined to overlook the factually faulty numbers.

More about the latter in an upcoming post.
For now, this much: no, it is not a con-spiracy!

Sunday, July 31, 2011

Juliet - excellent Job, again!


I must say, I'm increasingly impressed by the rather formidable Juliet Eilperin.

I first noticed her promo video and now comes this article in Foreign Policy.
Like Richard remarks, it is refreshingly factual and devoid of the usual pathos and hype, and this in spite of the difficult topic, the recent rise in reported Shark attacks. This is excellent, well documented and highly erudite journalism for which she needs to be commended.
Required reading - and BTW, what a monumental difference to the usual pathetic explanations by the Sesselfurzer!

Incidentally, I've also just finished reading Demon Fish.
More about it later but for now, only this: the praise is well deserved!

Kudos!

Wednesday, June 22, 2011

Video!


This is good stuff.
Factual, for once original, emotional yet without the usual unhelpful pathos and the usual unhelpful statements.
Kudos!