tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36324352.post8688780753161240597..comments2024-03-25T12:38:37.998+12:00Comments on The Best Shark Dive in the World!: Shark Conservation - Job done?Andrew Cumminghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14675497080700112390noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36324352.post-79326322443047414072015-10-26T15:35:11.054+12:002015-10-26T15:35:11.054+12:00Yes I have, and linked to it in the post!
It does...Yes I have, and linked to it in the post!<br /><br />It does not say "the 97m are wrong" but merely says, that number is based on a helluva lot of assumptions, and making other equally plausible assumptions would have led to a much lower result.<br /><br />Nothing new really - we're back to the thorny issue of requiring good data = hard numbers. And you know who has them but is not DaSharkhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06787762757245289307noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36324352.post-37820954035159052502015-10-26T12:03:53.479+12:002015-10-26T12:03:53.479+12:00Hey, have you read the paper that questions the as...Hey, have you read the paper that questions the assumptions of the 100 million paper? It doesn't give a new number, but someone could do the math...Angelo Villagomezhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00970383305205702533noreply@blogger.com